Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

UK Industry Tender Report - Security

Business
Thea Phillips
August 10, 2026

August 2025 to August 2026

The UK security procurement market continues to be one of the most active and competitive sectors in the public sector. For security firms, understanding the bidding landscape is essential for targeting the right opportunities and structuring winning bids.

This report pulls together the latest available data on security tenders, values, procurement routes, buyer requirements and regional trends to give you a clear picture of where the market stands and where it is heading.

Market Overview

Number of Published Tenders

In 2025, approximately 517 security-related tender notices were published across the UK.

Depending on how the security market is defined, the total ranges from approximately 345 tenders under the narrowest guarding-only definition to 586 under the widest definition, incorporating CCTV and electronic security codes.

For the purposes of this report, 517 tender notices is used as the headline figure to provide a consistent representation of the wider UK security procurement market.

The data covers areas including manned guarding, mobile patrols, keyholding, CCTV, alarms, access control, security systems maintenance and related security services.

Public Sector Security Awards

Alongside published opportunities, approximately 570 individual security contract awards across 386 procurements were tracked during 2025.

The difference between the number of procurements and individual awards reflects the structure of public sector contracting, where frameworks and multi-lot procurements can result in multiple suppliers being appointed through a single procurement exercise.

Total Procurement Value

Approximately £1.06 billion of reported security contract value was identified across tracked public sector security awards during 2025.

This included approximately:

  • £312 million in directly awarded security contracts
  • £443 million in framework agreement ceilings
  • £303 million in integrated detention and facilities contracts where guarding represents a major component of the requirement

These figures should be interpreted carefully. Framework ceilings represent the maximum potential value available through an agreement rather than guaranteed supplier revenue, while integrated contracts may include services beyond security.

The scale of individual procurements also varies considerably.

One of the largest security-related contracts appearing in 2025 procurement data was the £904.9 million Department for Work and Pensions estates security contract held by G4S, covering guarding, security systems and maintenance across the DWP estate.

However, this was not a new £904.9 million contract awarded in 2025. The figure represents the cumulative value of a contract running since 2017 and was disclosed through an extension notice published in April 2025.

Among the largest new awards and procurement arrangements in 2025 were:

  • Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre – £140.7 million, awarded to Mitie
  • NHS SBS Security Services, CCTV and VSS Framework – £125 million ceiling, with 112 suppliers appointed
  • Home Office eGates contract – £54.2 million

These major procurements demonstrate the significant value available at the top of the market, while smaller local and regional contracts continue to provide opportunities for SMEs.

Average Contract Value

Across reported security awards, the mean award value was approximately £880,000, while the median was approximately £125,000.

The significant difference between the mean and median demonstrates how a relatively small number of major contracts can distort average market values.

For larger, above-threshold security opportunities, a typical contract value is approximately £400,000.

The comparatively low £125,000 median also reflects the growing number of smaller public contracts now appearing within published procurement data.

Security suppliers should therefore consider contract values according to service type, geography, buyer and procurement route, rather than relying solely on the overall mean.

SME Share of the Market

SMEs secured approximately 38.4% of security contract awards by number during 2025, increasing to approximately 44.7% when shared and consortium awards are included.

However, SMEs accounted for only around 5% of total reported contract value.

This highlights a significant divide within the market: SMEs are successfully securing a substantial number of public sector security contracts, but the highest-value opportunities remain concentrated among larger providers.

The median SME contract win was approximately £600,000, compared with approximately £1.25 million for larger suppliers.

For smaller security providers, this indicates that considerable public sector opportunity exists, but successfully moving into higher-value contracts may require stronger evidence, greater capacity, relevant accreditations and a strategic approach to frameworks and larger competitions.

Year-on-Year Tender Growth

Published security tender numbers increased significantly during 2025.

Approximately 357 security tender notices were identified in 2024, compared with 517 in 2025, representing a headline increase of approximately 45%.

However, changes in procurement publication requirements mean this headline figure does not represent organic market growth alone.

On a more comparable like-for-like basis, underlying growth in security tender activity is estimated at approximately 12–17% year-on-year.

Early 2026 activity is also running approximately 12% ahead of 2025 year-to-date, indicating that procurement activity within the sector remains strong.

Year-on-Year Contract Value

Published security contract values also increased substantially between 2024 and 2025.

On a published-values basis, identified contract value increased from approximately £1.24 billion in 2024 to £2.41 billion in 2025, representing a headline increase of approximately 94%.

However, this increase is heavily distorted by a small number of exceptionally large contracts and disclosures.

When the £904.9 million DWP estates security contract is excluded, year-on-year growth falls to approximately 21%.

Removing the largest custodial and other exceptional contracts further reduces the difference, suggesting that the underlying security market by contract value remained broadly stable compared with 2024.

The headline 94% increase should therefore not be interpreted as evidence that the underlying UK security procurement market almost doubled in a single year.

Procurement Routes

Open Procedure

The Open Procedure remains common for standard guarding, single-service and relatively straightforward security requirements.

This is a single-stage competition in which all interested and eligible suppliers can submit a tender.

Competitive Flexible Procedure

The Competitive Flexible Procedure was introduced under the Procurement Act 2023 and provides buyers with greater freedom to structure more complex competitions.

It is particularly relevant to integrated, complex or technology-enabled security contracts and allows buyers to design multi-stage processes that may include selection stages, dialogue, presentations, demonstrations or negotiation.

As buyers become more familiar with the Procurement Act regime, this procedure is likely to become increasingly visible across complex security procurement.

Frameworks

Frameworks are a major route for public sector security procurement.

They are particularly suited to recurring requirements such as guarding, keyholding, mobile patrols, CCTV, access control, vacant property security and wider electronic security services.

Contracts awarded under a framework may involve a further competitive process or, where the framework permits and contains an objective supplier-selection mechanism, may be awarded without further competition.

For security suppliers, securing a place on relevant frameworks can therefore provide access to multiple future contract opportunities.

Dynamic Markets and Legacy DPS

Under the Procurement Act 2023, Dynamic Markets replace Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS) for new procurements.

Like DPS arrangements, Dynamic Markets establish pools of qualified suppliers that can compete for future opportunities, with new suppliers able to apply to join throughout the market's lifetime.

Legacy DPS arrangements established under the previous procurement regime may still operate during the transitional period, meaning security suppliers may encounter both terms.

Dynamic Markets may be particularly relevant for repeat, fragmented or evolving security requirements where buyers require access to a flexible supplier base.

Direct Award

Direct awards are permitted only where relevant statutory grounds are satisfied.

These can include specific circumstances such as extreme and unavoidable urgency, protection of life, certain single-supplier situations or where a competitive procedure has produced no suitable tenders.

They are applicable within the security sector but should generally be treated as an exception rather than a routine route to market.

Common Buyer Requirements

ISOs

ISO certifications can be particularly important in security tenders as evidence of a supplier's management systems, competence and ability to control risk.

Common certifications include:

  • ISO 9001 – Quality Management
  • ISO 14001 – Environmental Management
  • ISO 45001 – Occupational Health and Safety
  • ISO 27001 – Information Security Management

ISO 27001 is particularly relevant for CCTV platforms, monitoring centres, access control systems and cyber or technology-enabled security services.

ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 are commonly relevant to manned guarding, facilities management and larger integrated security contracts.

Buyers may accept equivalent evidence in some procurements rather than requiring a particular certification, so suppliers should always check the individual tender requirements.

Cyber Essentials

Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus are increasingly relevant where suppliers access buyer systems, networks, personal data or sensitive information.

They are particularly relevant for technical security, CCTV, remote monitoring, access control and managed security services.

As physical and digital security systems become increasingly interconnected, cyber-security credentials are becoming more relevant to traditional physical-security providers.

CHAS, SafeContractor and Constructionline

CHAS, SafeContractor and Constructionline may be requested where security staff or systems are deployed across construction, estate, facilities management or operational sites.

These schemes can provide evidence of health and safety, contractor-management and wider supply-chain compliance.

Their importance varies considerably according to the nature of the contract and they should not be regarded as universal requirements across all security tenders.

DBS Checks

DBS checks are commonly required for security personnel accessing sites involving vulnerable people, children, healthcare, education or other sensitive settings.

Buyers may specify basic, standard or enhanced checks depending on the role, environment and activities being undertaken.

Equivalent disclosure arrangements apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Industry-Specific Accreditations

SIA licensing is a fundamental legal requirement for individuals undertaking specified regulated private-security activities, including areas such as security guarding, public-space CCTV operation, door supervision and close protection.

The SIA Approved Contractor Scheme (ACS) is voluntary but is frequently requested or valued within manned-guarding procurement. Approved contractors are assessed against 78 performance indicators across seven essential criteria.

NSI or SSAIB certification can be particularly relevant to alarms, CCTV, access control and electronic security systems.

Other industry memberships, certifications or equivalent evidence may also be requested depending on the particular security service.

Right-to-work checks, appropriate insurance coverage, employee screening and vetting, TUPE capability and strong business-continuity arrangements are also common buyer considerations.

Evaluation Criteria

Price vs Quality Weightings

Each buyer sets its own evaluation weightings according to the complexity, value and risk associated with the contract.

Security contracts are frequently evaluated on both price and quality rather than price alone.

Typical structures can include:

  • 40% Price, 50% Quality, 10% Social Value
  • 30% Price, 60% Quality, 10% Social Value

A 60% quality / 40% price model, with Social Value incorporated within the wider quality score, is also seen within security procurement.

Higher-risk and more complex security requirements may place even greater emphasis on quality, particularly where service failure could create safety, safeguarding, operational or reputational risks.

Social Value

Social Value has become an increasingly important consideration within public procurement.

Under current central-government procurement policy, in-scope organisations are required to apply a minimum 10% Social Value weighting, or equivalent measurement, although individual contracting authorities and procurements may take different approaches.

Security suppliers should therefore expect Social Value to remain a significant area of bid evaluation, with relevant commitments potentially covering local employment, apprenticeships, skills development, employment opportunities and support for people facing barriers to work.

Regional Breakdown

Regional analysis should be approached carefully because procurement data may classify opportunities according to contract delivery location, buyer location or multiple regions.

However, BidStats currently reports the following number of security procurement notices associated with UK regions during the past 12 months:

  • London – 145
  • North West – 82
  • South East – 70
  • South West – 48
  • East Midlands – 44
  • Yorkshire & Humber – 44
  • East of England – 40
  • West Midlands – 28
  • Scotland – 25
  • North East – 17
  • Wales – 17

These regional figures should not be added together to produce a UK-wide total, as procurements may cover more than one region.

The data nevertheless indicates particularly strong procurement activity in London and the North West.

Among the English regions outside London, the North West records the highest number of security procurement notices, with approximately 82, compared with 70 in the South East.

The North West also records almost five times as many security procurement notices as the North East, demonstrating a significant difference in published procurement activity between the two regions.

A reliable assessment of the fastest-growing UK region would require like-for-like regional data from 2024 and 2025 and should not be inferred from current tender volumes alone.

Using This Data

The data shows a substantial and active UK security procurement market, with 517 tender notices and 570 individual contract awards tracked during 2025.

While published tender activity increased by 45% year-on-year, like-for-like analysis indicates underlying growth of approximately 12–17%, providing a more realistic picture of market expansion. Early 2026 data also suggests that activity remains strong.

The figures also reveal an important opportunity for smaller security providers. SMEs secured 38.4% of awards by number, demonstrating that smaller businesses are successfully competing for public sector work. However, with SMEs accounting for only around 5% of total reported contract value, there remains a considerable gap between winning public sector contracts and accessing the market's largest opportunities.

For security businesses looking to strengthen their position, preparation is key. Maintaining relevant accreditations, building a strong evidence library, developing measurable Social Value commitments and demonstrating the capacity to mobilise and manage increasingly complex contracts can all improve bid readiness.

Frameworks and Dynamic Markets can also provide important routes into longer-term public sector opportunities, while understanding regional procurement activity can help suppliers make more informed decisions about where to focus business development resources.

At Bid Writing Service, we help security companies navigate the tendering process, understand what buyers are looking for and develop stronger, evidence-based submissions.

Are you looking to win more security contracts? Get in touch with our team to discuss how we can support your next tender, framework application or wider bid strategy: info@bidwritingservice.com

You May Also Like

Explore more insights and success strategies from our experts.

What Our
Clients Say

See how we’ve helped SMEs across industries secure contracts and grow their success.

S

Syed Hasan

Accounts Manager

We engaged Bid Writing Service to support our submission for the GMC tender, aiming to drive potential growth for our business. While we are still awaiting the final outcome, we can confidently say the service has been excellent and well worth the investment. Special thanks to Jessica, Peter, and Francesca, whose professionalism, responsiveness, and attention to detail greatly contributed to the strength of our submission. Their collaborative approach and expertise made the entire process smooth and reassuring. Highly recommended for any organisation seeking expert bid support.

O

Office Staff

I recently had the pleasure of working with BWS on a bid, and I wanted to share my overwhelmingly positive experience. Their expertise and guidance were truly exceptional and instrumental in our success. Throughout the entire process, BWS provided unwavering support and demonstrated an impressive depth of industry knowledge. I genuinely believe their contributions were the key to our successful bid. Without hesitation, I would wholeheartedly recommend BWS and certainly plan to collaborate with them again in the future.

A

Andrew Hobbs

We engaged Bid Writing Service to support us in responding to a public tender opportunity. The service provided was simply exceptional. Well organised, proactive and responsive, accurate, punctual and of course very well written. This is a quality company with some really excellent client facing members of staff. Thank you Rhiannon, Francesca, Thea, Georgia and Lauren. Brilliant first impression and thoroughly recommended !!

J

Joseph Palmer

We've been working with Lauren and Rhiannon at Bid Writing Service for a few months now and they have been great! They are super responsive to emails and are always there to guide/support us through the process. As soon as a tender get released that matches our industry Lauren sends it straight over even if it's an evening or weekend so we have piece of mind knowing we won't miss any tenders! Thank you Lauren & Rhiannon

R

Ross Nicholson

Rhiannon was very switched on when it came to giving our company advice around bid writing. She produced drafts in a swift and professional manner which was important to us when the deadline was approaching fast.

V

Vanessa Varoujian

Incredibly professional, responsive and dedicated. Great to have a team who take the time to get to know the business and our ethos, and understand the pressures of tender and bid writing for a small organisation.

V

Vinceo Ferlita

Crown ices Ltd.

One of the best companies we have worked with. From our first conversation to the completed work. Always on hand for any questions we had, very knowledgeable and timely. Would use again and would highly recommend. Thank you for your hard work and such excellent service. Crown ices Ltd.

J

James Barber

I can not recommend BWS highly enough. Our first call with Luke was professional and built an immediate trust in the business. Lauren then took on our project at short notice with a 48 hour turn around time. She went above and beyond to ensure it was completed on time. We are now going to have a conversation about building a bid library and them becoming our exclusive supplier.

C

Chris C

Lauren from BWS went above and beyond to support us with our tender on extremely short notice. Her dedication, professionalism, and willingness to assist at all hours were second to none. Lauren's expertise and responsiveness made what could have been a stressful process smooth and efficient. I cannot recommend her highly enough for anyone needing reliable and high-quality support.

G

GMS SERVICES LTD

We have used BWS to assist with our bid writing services. Not only does this provide us with vital resources when there are multiple tenders we want to bid for, it also provides a quality bid which is written by engaging bid writers who are interested in our business and helping us succeed. They become a part of our business. We would highly recommend their services and many thanks to George Flower who has delivered a brilliant service for us.

A

Andrea Gascoigne

Recently won a nice project with the help of BWS, found them easy to work with and will use again.

B

Barry Chapman

We used this company as part of our growth strategy, in that they, and I mean Lauren Moorhouse as their lead, created from scratch a comprehensive Bid Library. This is an excellent process to begin this new phase of our development, to gain more work and raising our branding profile. The whole system, was great to see how it grew into the formidable tool that it is, which we now have at our disposal, with an increase in our confidence to bolster our turnover.

B

B&E Boys

We employed BWS to assist with our bid writing and knowledge management resources. The team were always very professional and flexible in working around our schedules whilst maintaining agreed deadlines. We would recommend BWS to others who are looking for a ‘fresh set of eyes’ on any business development material. We will be working with BWS in the future.

M

Matt Webb

We engaged with BWS to assist with a bid on a civils project and were very pleased with the work they delivered. There was always clear communication and documents were produced within the agreed timeframes and cost. Being the first time working with a bid writing company they immediately put as at ease and gave us confidence that our submission was as strong as possible which gave us the best chance. Thanks to all the team at BWS!

N

Nick Heath

Compass Fuel

We dived into the world of tenders, and Lauren made the process fairly simple for novices like ourselves. Wouldnt hesitate to use their services again. Nick Heath - Compass Fuel

J

Josh Lownsborough

Working with Kyle has been a pleasure , He has been working weekends and evenings to get the job ready in time, His responses are superb and he is a real professional at his job. I hope we win the contract and I will certainly use Kyle again in the future

M

Matt

My organisation has only recently started working with BWS and we have already seen a win! The team are always professional and work around my schedule. We will continue to work with BWS for future bids, thanks BWS team!

T

Tracey Gordon

Excellent, efficient and professional service from Lauren & Rhiannon. Would 100% recommend and will definitely use again.

J

James Bell

Great service. Quick turnaround and well written bid. Fingers crossed for a successful tender outcome.

C

Chris Davy

We used BWS and found them very quick and efficient, well worth using and will do again

A

Anele Griessel

Rhiannon was friendly, listened, and clarified our questions. Thank you very much

M

Mirela Stefan